I think the trick is that for a vast majority of people, myself included, it was brilliant for a single play through, niggles about things aside.FlowerChild wrote:Huh. I'm actually surprised so many people feel similarly to the way I do. If you take a look at metacritic, the reviews for the game are all so astronomically good, that you would think no one had a single complaint about the game.
...I'm yet to go back and replay it, despite my love of it's humor and visuals.
Honestly, I'm not convinced that stuff like metacritic is that helpful - lookit, say, Skyrim.
It's got it's high points for sure, but it's also one of the most horribly designed games I've played in recent memory with half-arsed mechanics all over the place, and stuff that could have been put in and wasn't (by way of example - Skyrim's a mountainy place. Navigating these is... hard, unless you have a horse because horses say "fuck you gravity". And yet, no where in skyrim is there any kind of mountain climbing gear - Even just a simpleish grapple and rope mechanic could have been huge and explored properly, could have given you cool ways to interact with exploring cities, caves and fighting things like dragons and giants. obviously, there's issues with implementing something like this, but hey, Just Cause 2 pulled it off.)
Pretty, sure, and the exploration is kinda neat, but everything else wears thin very, very rapidly.
...And yet it's being lauded as game of the year in a lot of places - It's a flashy game for sure, but it has no substance.