Neah, your self-righteousness is based on misinformation. It's like a witch hunt really. The fact that you're willing to fight for something doesn't mean it's right, it just means that you feel strongly for it.Kingfisher wrote:You people may not respect my opinion, but you might just respect my willingness to take a stand for what I think is right.
Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
- Poppycocks
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Who said I said you didn't respect my opinion.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
I think what he meant by standing up for what he believes, he meant staying neutral in the whole thing and having nobody fightPoppycocks wrote: Neah, your self-righteousness is based on misinformation. It's like a witch hunt really. The fact that you're willing to fight for something doesn't mean it's right, it just means that you feel strongly for it.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
I an trying to be Switzerland. By that I mean neutral.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Er... now I'm confused. HahaKingfisher wrote:I an trying to be Switzerland. By that I mean neutral.
- Poppycocks
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Meh, applies anyway, I calls 'em as i sees 'em. And I see a fanboy.BinoAl wrote:I think what he meant by standing up for what he believes, he meant staying neutral in the whole thing and having nobody fight
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Ugh. All I know is that I've barely put any work into my add-on hour-for-hour, but I would be absolutely pissed if someone decided to put it into a mod pack without my permission. And if they asked, and I said no, if they then got upset I would be furious. It's a mod authors right to decide at the very least how the mod is distributed. These packs draw attention away from the mods being distributed. Instead of thanking the mod authors, you find yourself thanking the technic people, or whatever other mod pack persons in question.
I can say that I didn't really have an opinion on mod packs until I delved into modding myself. But now I can see where someone would be upset, myself included.
I can say that I didn't really have an opinion on mod packs until I delved into modding myself. But now I can see where someone would be upset, myself included.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Sure, I may be a fan. So what? Doesn't mean I can't be mature and see both sides. Now, let us stop. I know I started this, but I want to end this. No flame war thanks.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
You're being overly defensive here, man... For the most part, we are trying to be nice, but you keep acting as if your being victimizedKingfisher wrote:Sure, I may be a fan. So what? Doesn't mean I can't be mature and see both sides.
- TheAnarchitect
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:21 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Kingfisher, there's no point. We don't need a neutral party. If you want to be a neutral party, that's fine, but we have no reason to bend over just to help you do that. Seeing both sides doesn't necessarily make you mature.
I don't respect your opinion just because it's an opinion. As the saying goes, if you are willing to tolerate all ideas, you need to tolerate the idea that I am unwilling to tolerate certain ideas.
Also, take the time to proofread your posts. You are coming across like a 14 year old who just discovered the internet. And if that's what you are, you need to doubly take the time to mull your posts over, to compensate.
I don't respect your opinion just because it's an opinion. As the saying goes, if you are willing to tolerate all ideas, you need to tolerate the idea that I am unwilling to tolerate certain ideas.
Also, take the time to proofread your posts. You are coming across like a 14 year old who just discovered the internet. And if that's what you are, you need to doubly take the time to mull your posts over, to compensate.
The infinitely extendable Pottery system
Real Life is an Anarchy Server.
Real Life is an Anarchy Server.
- Poppycocks
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Couldn't put it better, even if I tried.TheAnarchitect wrote:-snip-
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
<3TheAnarchitect wrote:Kingfisher, there's no point. We don't need a neutral party. If you want to be a neutral party, that's fine, but we have no reason to bend over just to help you do that. Seeing both sides doesn't necessarily make you mature.
I don't respect your opinion just because it's an opinion. As the saying goes, if you are willing to tolerate all ideas, you need to tolerate the idea that I am unwilling to tolerate certain ideas.
Also, take the time to proofread your posts. You are coming across like a 14 year old who just discovered the internet. And if that's what you are, you need to doubly take the time to mull your posts over, to compensate.
Hey, Sargunster, where's that damn +1 button? :)
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
First, I'm 13. Second, I could take that as an insult. But I won't. Third, you may not want a neutral, but I do.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Is attempting to alienate me achieving anything? I am not referring to the later part of your post, the rest of it is constructive critisicsm.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Is acting like the victim here really achieving anything? You've been beating the same idea into the ground and trying to "act mature".Kingfisher wrote:Is attempting to alienate me achieving anything?
Anyway, you'll probably end up banned soon enough. I don't really see any point for us to keep posting in response to him, guys
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Banned for what? I'm perfectly within my grounds to post here. No slander, racism sexism or trolling.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
- ilovekintoki
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:57 am
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
I for one am starting to question my viewpoints because of Kingfisher's excellent posts.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Starting to suspect otherwise. Plus, I'm sure you would piss off FC, and that's rule number 1Kingfisher wrote:No slander, racism sexism or trolling.
Lmao. Seriously sarg, I need the damn +1 buttonilovekintoki wrote:I for one am starting to question my viewpoints because of Kingfisher's excellent posts.
- Stormweaver
- Posts: 3230
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:06 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Actually it's rule 3#.BinoAl wrote:Starting to suspect otherwise. Plus, I'm sure you would piss off FC, and that's rule numberKingfisher wrote:No slander, racism sexism or trolling.
Forum rules.
PatriotBob wrote:Damn it, I'm going to go eat pumpkin pie while I still think that it tastes good.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Alright then, what do you want from me?
And please no sarcasm.
And please no sarcasm.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Aha, my bad. Still, he's breaking rules 1, probably 2, and certainly 3 if FC was present :)
We want you to quit beating the same point into the ground, and have a logical conversation without acting as if we are victimizing youKingfisher wrote:Alright then, what do you want from me?
And please no sarcasm.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Fine, but still, we should stop this MASSIVE DERAILMENT. I feel sorry for wasting your time. Let's get back on track.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
That's the point. We're more trying to figure out what exactly you want from us? If it's agreement on that people on both sides need to chill, then I'm pretty sure you're preaching to the choir. If it's someone who can act as our 'mediator' on the technic forums, then let me assure you that we're quite capable of discussing it ourselves on there. What exactly brought you here? What were you trying to accomplish?Kingfisher wrote:Alright then, what do you want from me?
And please no sarcasm.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 pm
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Alright, if you have anymore questions for me, take em' to #antitechnic. Otherwise, i am going to stop posting here.
I feel like ABSOLUTE SCUM.
Re: Forestry's Anti-Technic Pack move
Massive derailment is a prerequisite on the off-topic subforum ^.^Kingfisher wrote:Fine, but still, we should stop this MASSIVE DERAILMENT.
The issue is, I'm not sure what track we were even supposed to be on. Graphite words the problem best, I'd respond to his question to give a clear idea of what you wantKingfisher wrote:Let's get back on track.