Nom noms.

This forum is for anything that doesn't specifically have to do with Better Than Wolves

Burger King or Mcdonalds?

Burger King
15
38%
Mcdonalds
24
62%
 
Total votes: 39
User avatar
Panda
Posts: 1472
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:29 am
Location: Kanagawa

Nom noms.

Post by Panda »

Doing alittle research for fun.
Never say no to Panda.
User avatar
SgtChuckle
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by SgtChuckle »

I have to say... Neither. If I want to get a burger my apartment is right next to a Five Guy's, BEST BURGERS EVAR. I choose McDonald's though because they have a chicken sandwich that is a perfect replica of Chick Fil A's and there isn't a Chick Fil A within 15 miles of me.
Poppycocks wrote:Suggesting to hack the logo on all sides is akin to suggesting someone to take a crap out of a window if he doesn't like his toilet seat.
User avatar
Urian
Posts: 1691
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:11 am
Location: Finland

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Urian »

Err, neither actually :) I only eat fast food burgers if I'm drunk or hung over but since I can't stand McD I have to go with burger king (even if there are no burger kings in Finland, I still preferred it when I lived abroad).
FlowerChild: Ice in deserts is a good idea
User avatar
rmdashrrootsplat
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by rmdashrrootsplat »

Neither for me as well... I avoid chains like the plague and would rather go to a local food joint. ;)
morvelaira wrote:Do it! Burst into flames. Thank you! ...You! Flames!
Burst into Flames. Morvy demands it.
User avatar
SgtChuckle
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by SgtChuckle »

Mmh, heathen Americans like me need burgers to survive, so I just get the yummiest option (again, Five Guys) instead of a mystery meat surprise from McD.
Poppycocks wrote:Suggesting to hack the logo on all sides is akin to suggesting someone to take a crap out of a window if he doesn't like his toilet seat.
User avatar
M!C
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:29 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Nom noms.

Post by M!C »

Neither for me too ... I sometimes go to Subway though. Their stuff tastes like food at least. ;)
User avatar
morvelaira
Posts: 2406
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:56 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Nom noms.

Post by morvelaira »

I voted McDonalds, but only for the french fries. If Five Guys was an option, cajun fries wins >.>
She-who-bears the right of Prima Squee-ti
I make BTW videos! http://www.youtube.com/user/morvelaira
The kitten is traumatized by stupid. Please stop abusing the kitten.
Mason11987
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 11:03 am

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Mason11987 »

5 guys is ridiculously expensive around me. I can get a burger that's maybe half as good for a quarter the price at mcdonalds. If I want to spend 10-15 bucks on a meal I'll go to an actual restaurant. Five Guys is good but it's price (at least near me) puts it in competition with decent restaurants, not fast food places.
User avatar
Ribky
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:08 am
Location: CONFIDENTIAL

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Ribky »

McDonald's got my vote, only because Big Mac > Whopper.

Though I'd choose any of the following, in no particular order, over either of those anytime, depending on my current location:

Five Guys (though it is pretty expensive, and is slightly overrated)
In N' Out (I miss California)
Sonic (Cherry Limeade, ftw)
What-a-burger (I miss Texas)
Wendy's (why isn't it listed in poll?)
Jack-in-the-Box
Jumpin' Jacks (not a chain, so really can't count, but coleslaw on a bacon double cheeseburger just freakin' wins)

Hell... I'd even choose White Castle over either of those... if only for their ability to cure hangovers before they happen.
The spice must flow...

[03:28] <Detritus_> Weird, I'm still logged in her
User avatar
FaceFoiled
Posts: 928
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:21 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by FaceFoiled »

I do love a quick burger from time to time, and both Maccies and Burger king can help with that. :P That said, the burgers from burger king are overal just more "fresh", and don't look/taste like a microwave burger. I like em both though, but if I have the option I would go for burger king.
User avatar
jorgebonafe
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Brasil

Re: Nom noms.

Post by jorgebonafe »

Hard Rock Cafe
Better Than Wolves was borne of anal sex. True Story.
User avatar
Gormador
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 1:09 pm
Location: France

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Gormador »

I choose McDonald's because those are what we get the most of in Paris (not even sure there is a Burger King in France). But even then, it's a "last resort" choice.

To all French people here, living in Paris, here's an address where you you absolutely need to go if you like awesome burgers :
2 bis, Rue des Ecoles, just near Jussieu's University (and subway station). For 15Euros, you get a so called "Cheesburger geant" (Giant Cheesburger) which contains 2 enormous pieces of meat (beef, would say around 200g (0.4 lb) each).
And it's just the best burger I've ever had. And I'm not a big fan of meat.

(got no shares there, it's just a freakin' great bar, with "an" happy hour from 11h30 am to 1am (the next day), 3euros the pint, which is close to nothing in Paris !)

[/ad finished ^^]


But yeah, McDonald's wins thanks to it's wraps.
FlowerChild wrote:If you have a suggestion, I recommend that it have pure manna from heaven flowing forth from its vagina to warrant posting it at this point in time.
whitechaos35
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:19 am

Re: Nom noms.

Post by whitechaos35 »

I spent $12 at the Los Angeles International Airport at the Burger King in the terminal I was waiting in. It was the most pathetic meal I had ever had. I'm not a fan of any large chains, but I avoid Burger King like the plague now.
User avatar
Katalliaan
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Katalliaan »

Neither. I can't remember the last time I ate at a Burger King, and the last time I ate at a McDonald's was when I was watching my nephew (the little brat insisted on it).
Open in case of fire
Spoiler
Show
Not now stupid - in case of fire
User avatar
PureZaros
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:35 pm
Location: With a herd of alpaca in the La Raya mountains

Re: Nom noms.

Post by PureZaros »

McDonalds.

I can get two hamburgers and fries for under 5 bucks.

Yeah, I'm a cheap bastard.
Spoiler
Show
FlowerChild wrote:
Panda wrote:Edit: Thanks for the sticky good sir. <3
I really wish more women said things like this.
User avatar
Shengji
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:35 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Shengji »

Fast food (of any description) is my guilty pleasure - hence me skimming my ideal weight and never achieving it - and certainly I enjoy both but burger king is just that little bit more enjoyable for me, juicier and better chips :)
7 months, 37 different border checks and counting.
User avatar
walker_boh_65
Posts: 2304
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Nom noms.

Post by walker_boh_65 »

PureZaros wrote:McDonalds.

I can get two hamburgers and fries for under 5 bucks.

Yeah, I'm a cheap bastard.
This is my feelings on it as well. The food doesn't have to be spectacular by any means, but if its cheep, close by, and I'm in a rush, why not?
User avatar
DaveYanakov
Posts: 2090
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:17 am

Re: Nom noms.

Post by DaveYanakov »

PureZaros wrote:McDonalds.

I can get two hamburgers and fries for under 5 bucks.

Yeah, I'm a cheap bastard.
You can get that at Burger King as well and the burgers are better.
Better is the enemy of Good
User avatar
ilovekintoki
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:57 am

Re: Nom noms.

Post by ilovekintoki »

Both are awful, but I vote Burger King I guess.
User avatar
Urian
Posts: 1691
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:11 am
Location: Finland

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Urian »

One thing that several people have mentioned or suggested and that I know holds true for me; the fries are often just as, if not even more, important than the burgers. I very seldom, even when I'm falling down drunk, get the craving for burgers (and on the few occasions I do I go to some grill where the food is identifiable) but a craving for fries is much more common. In fact, the major factor for which chain I prefer is the fries and what dips they offer.

Oh, and sign me up for subway as well :p Even though it's hardly healthy it's a far step up from any greasy burgers!
FlowerChild: Ice in deserts is a good idea
User avatar
Wgurgh
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:55 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Wgurgh »

Well since burgers were so much mentioned I had to go with BK. I also like their fries better. Thing that made me hesitate is if I am in need of a fast breakfast I will pick McD's every time. If I DO happen to go to McD's for a burger, it won't be a big mac and it will be something with lots of condiments.
I did a (very unscientific) study once comparing the burgers between the two, and I mean JUST the burger. As in the meat part, or what is called meat. I determined that BK won because I did get a hint that a cow may have at least at one time passed near the thing.
User avatar
Pseudosavior
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 5:32 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Pseudosavior »

McDonalds would have to be my choice, and for only one good reason.

The McDicken (Also known as the McGangbang). It's a finely crafted bastard child of two dollar menu items, so it's a cheap item. What you do, is take a McDouble and split it between the patties, then put a McChicken (bottom bun is optional) between the patties and enjoy. It honestly tastes like whatever deity you worship or don't... Basically it's paradise.

It's commonly referred to as a stoner/drunk food, because it tastes better when you're not so sober... I'm not a HUGE fan of either chain with any other option, but I'll be damned if I can't eat my burgers McFrankenstyle... I feel so fat after eating them, that I forget I'm underweight.
User avatar
Katalliaan
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Katalliaan »

For you people that are talking about the fries, I'd suggest checking out the fries experiment from "Supersize Me" - essentially, he compared McDonald's friends and some of its sandwiches to a regular restaurant's equivalents. Over the course of 10 weeks, all the sandwiches and the other restaurant's fries got moldy. And the McDonald's fries? They looked exactly as they did when he first bought them.
Open in case of fire
Spoiler
Show
Not now stupid - in case of fire
User avatar
Ribky
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:08 am
Location: CONFIDENTIAL

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Ribky »

Pseudosavior wrote:McDonalds would have to be my choice, and for only one good reason.

The McDicken (Also known as the McGangbang). It's a finely crafted bastard child of two dollar menu items, so it's a cheap item. What you do, is take a McDouble and split it between the patties, then put a McChicken (bottom bun is optional) between the patties and enjoy. It honestly tastes like whatever deity you worship or don't... Basically it's paradise.

It's commonly referred to as a stoner/drunk food, because it tastes better when you're not so sober... I'm not a HUGE fan of either chain with any other option, but I'll be damned if I can't eat my burgers McFrankenstyle... I feel so fat after eating them, that I forget I'm underweight.
I... am... going... to craft... one of these... tonight... :)

EDIT: Crafting successful, my proximity to a McDonald's is... let's say... convenient... and this looks glorious.

EDIT2: I think I'm dying...
The spice must flow...

[03:28] <Detritus_> Weird, I'm still logged in her
User avatar
Poppycocks
Posts: 825
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:11 pm

Re: Nom noms.

Post by Poppycocks »

Fries and burgers in my fast food?! Inconceivable!

I like Kebab, it's either kebab or subway.
Post Reply